Shut Up, Government and Gaybashers

_{Stamp Template by Miarath (Found here:miarath.deviantart.com/art/Sta…)}
Don't like stamps? Don't look for them.
Read the description before you start whining.

WARNING: Possible "Offensive" Description Ahead!
-There is also lots of cursing, small children should leave the room~
If my insults don't apply to you, then they obviously don't apply to you, and are not directed at you. Don't be offended by something not meant for you.
Pre-thought: I support all forms of love, be it heterosexual, homosexual, pansexual, etc. Just let love be as free as letting a heart beat.

I don't give a flying fuck if you're an offended heterosexual, pull up your cum-slathered pants and grow a pair. Your love isn't the only love that exists, motherfucker. You don't need to open your eyes to other love, just open your mind, you paranoid shut-ins. No one is asking you to watch them have sex.

Yeah, this is something I've been meaning to make for awhile. I feel strongly about this, and really, if you want to stick your dick full of religion down other people's throats, then go love your religious fiction books elsewhere, cuz humans are allowed to love books but apparently not each other if they are of the same sex.

I don't have a problem with religion. I have a problem with people feeling as though they completely understand their religion, and thus force religion on others as a form of law or rules. Heads up, but I don't think God (or whoever you believe in) made you his/her spokesman, buddy. Sit the fuck down.

Not only do some people try to use religion as rules and laws, but they don't even follow all of that religion's rules in the first place. You're loyal? I think not.

Stamp Template (C) Miarath
Edits (C) Me

Let the bashing begin, I know someone out there is going to feel whole-heartedly against this and feel the need to speak their ignorant, closed little minds about this.
But before you do, <sub>"Hi, I don't give a fuck about your protest."


EDIT:

To clarify;
A lot of people are assuming that "love" means "sex". Not only is it sad that you equate the two, however there is a word called "lust" and is not the equivalent to love.

Necrophilia is not a form of love, unless it was relationship before one of them passed away. But really, as it has nothing to do with personality or relationships, it's just sex with a corpse that doesn't feel. It's more lust than anything, and it's one-sided and unhealthy. Therefore Necrophilia is not supported as it is not a form of love; it is a form of lust.

Incest is a form of love, and I do support it. If they love each other, that's their own business, and I stay out of it, as others should too, whether they want a child or not. They could decide on their own if they want a baby, and by choosing such option, they accept the fact that their child may be unhealthy and may be born with medical issues. But again, it's their business, if people don't like it, look away. Saying this, they could also adopt a child and free themselves from worrying about their own child being unhealthy or deformed. Therefore I support incest (however do not wish to see or know about it beyond that two people are in love).

Ephebophilia and Pedophilia, however, is a touchy subject since it involves younger people. I'd only support it if it was mutual love, but since it's between someone young with someone older (and more experienced with love, or lust, depending on how the older person actually feels about the younger one), the younger person may not understand the difference between love and lust. Yet this is a problem most older people have as well, which is why they date and break up so often, in most cases. Some teenagers put themselves out there, and then withdraw once they realize what it really means or what the affects really are, and they're called innocent. There are older people who are "creepers", but there are some who aren't and actually take it seriously, and really do love the younger person. I do support it, but only in the rare cases that are honest forms of love that can last, but it must be mutual. Rape and lust are not forms of love, and many of these instances are seen as rape, or something one-sided. It could have been that the younger person didn't know what they were in for, and that's why it's so frowned upon. It looks like the elderly are taking advantage of the youths. True forms of love in this are rare, but I'm sure there are a few instances out there.

Zoophile is another one where it depends, but I'm not against it. It's hard to find something mutual with an animal, and people believe that they have sometimes when they haven't. I have a dog, but I'd never have sex with him, because that's not what kind of love I feel towards him. For others, it may be different, and I wouldn't like to see it, but it can be love. If the animal isn't forced into it, then that's fine. There's also such a thing as training your pet, as you know, they can be taught not to just mindlessly mount visitors or friends of the owner. It's proven that animals can be taught not to do things, so why solo out teaching not to do this? Another reason is that animals can feel pain or discomfort, and they defend themselves when they feel the need to, and if they didn't want to be in the relationship with a human, they could lash out or try to get away, and if the person didn't let them defend themselves, then it isn't love- it's another case of lust. It all depends on how it happens and what happens. In summary, it's incredibly rare for the love to be real in these situations, but in the few cases where it is real, I support it (and do not wish to see it or know of it).</sub> 

If people don't socially accept any form of love, then they shouldn't look for it and it shouldn't be allowed in public. Some people have been bothered by even seeing a straight couple in public, kissing, touching, or more. There will always be a social boundary, and I think that all love should have boundaries in public, but just be allowed to legally have that love. Again, I know not all cases are love and involve lust or rape, and those aren't the instances I support. Much of what I support isn't something I'd like to see, but it's something that exists and I'm not against it.